s Rule Reversals (and the war for oil)

Alternative Culture MagazineCougar WebWorks Celebrating Nature, Culture, and Spirit
Alternative Culture Magazine

Alternative Culture Blog


Further Adventures of a Rogue Journalist

by Nowick Gray, Editor of Alternative Culture Magazine

journal online

 


Rule Reversals

       by Nowick Gray

Remember the "Golden Rule" of childhood?

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

This rule is predicated not only on the noble virtues of charity and trust, but also on the central human reality of self-interest. It also accords with our practical observations of self-fulfilling prophecy. Such behavior tends to have the result of reciprocal good will, for mutual benefit.

Somehow in this "adult" world of 2003, the rule has been turned upside down:

"Do unto others the worst you can imagine they might do unto you."

At least, this is the currently proclaimed rule of US foreign policy. Beyond the acting out of a sort of "advance vengeance," the chief ingredient here is fear, to go along with a more paranoid version of self-interest. Unfortunately, self-fulfilling prophecy is still at work, too. Retaliation in kind (through violence and terror) is sure to pose an even greater, more justifiable threat to American self-interest once hostilities begin.

In this mirrored confrontation of perceived threats, Saddam Hussein has been painted as another Hitler. But when recalling the historic blitzkrieg, bombers over London and troops invading Poland--my dictionary says "a swift, sudden military offensive, usually by combined air and mobile land forces"--it's the American strike force that bears a closer resemblance (leaving aside the historical connection between Hitler and banker Prescott Bush, the President's grandfather).

Is the "axis of evil," in this unstable equation, really Iraq + Iran + North Korea? Or is it the US + Britain + Israel? Current opinion polled at Time Magazine online shows the US as the greatest threat to world peace (87%).

While Iraq makes nothing but conciliatory statements and gestures of cooperation with weapons inspectors, North Korea taunts the US with outright declarations of defiance, nuclear capability, and treaty abrogation. Bush's response? To continue to pledge diplomacy for North Korea and military action against Iraq. Huh?

Something else must be going on here, besides fear and "homeland security." Is it trying to live up to daddy? Or is it something that Iraq has that North Korea doesn't--namely, oil--"black gold"?

To a nation raised on the Golden Rule in church and school, it's easier to sell a war on the basis of fear than on greed. It's convenient to turn that rule upside down from a position of fear and paranoid self-interest, even if the result is short-sighted. It's not so palatable to tell the world (or one's own population), "We're gonna take what we want, and to hell with the rest of you."

Fear and self-interest, in the twenty-first century, are still unquestioned. But greed, plunder, and aggression...that's a different barrel of oil.

If "weapons of mass destruction" are used to invade another country and steal its oil, that's not okay. But if the same weapons are used to invade another country and steal its oil because that country might have stored in secret somewhere the capability to someday manufacture and use weapons of mass destruction, then it's okay. Or so I hear...

I guess we're off the Gold Standard now, and hooked on Standard Oil. Pretty soon we'll dispense altogether with the smoke and mirrors and declare more honestly the operative creed:

"Do unto others whatever you must, if they have what you must have, to make them give it unto you."

The challenge remains, how to deal with people who hold to such policy, even if they are our own leaders? I don't know, but I guess that is has something to do with offering them (and ourselves) something more valuable than oil or gold. What could it be?

 


Lifeboat News -- up-to-date investigative journalism:
http://www.island.net/~lbnews

Is Bush Nuts?--a serious question, by William Thomas

Best articles of current analysis: http://www.zmag.org

 

 


journal online

Archive

Many of the essays appearing here are collected in convenient e-book format (pdf). Coming Home: Nature and Me and Other Essays is available now for free download.

Right-click to save to your computer: nature.pdf

Rule Reversals (January 2003)

Telling it Like it Is (January 2003)

White Rabbit (February 2002)

On Novelty (February 2002)

An Open Letter to the Democratic Party after September 11 (December 2001)

Psychoactive Sacramentals: Essays on Entheogens and Religion (book review) (November 2001)

Forest Storm (September 2001)

Feminism, Poetic Myth, and Alternative Culture - An Homage to The White Goddess (July 2000)

Quests for Identity and Other Addictions (May 2000)

Wheel of Fortune (April 2000)

Great Writers and Street Poets (February 2000)

Upgrade for Speed Because Time is Running Out? (August 1999)

Retail Therapy: Decision Making in the Computer Age (August 1999)

Retail Therapy2: Random Brief Downtimes (August 1999)

Farouche Speaks (April 1999)

NetGlut: Notes from a cleansing fast (February 1998)

To Unix and Back Alive (January 1997)

Webness (November 1996)

Surfing Again (November 1996)

Bananas in British Columbia (May 1996)

Confessions of a computer addict (May 1996)


About the Editor | Site Map | Homepage | Email | ©2006 Cougar WebWorks