Who’s Your Target Audience?

by Mankh

a percentage of the world
doesn’t have a computer or mobile-phone,
who’s your target audience?

many people don’t believe or trust
the corporate news anymore, many do,
who’s your target audience?

thus far in 2023, in the USEmpire
over 180 mass shootings

in 2022, over 400 defenders
of Mother Earth and human rights in 26 countries
were killed

In 2020, global military spending was almost 2-trillion dollars,
who’s the target audience?

the Robin — who has built a nest outside my office window
without ever watching a video on how to build a nest —
will not read this poem but we are still friends

the uncountable blades of grass
simply will not read a single book,
who’s my target audience?

however many grains of sand remain
because they are an over-consumed resource,
who’s the target audience?

the universe supposedly sports about
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars . . . . .
reminding each of us 

be your true self,
stay with the path,
do what you’re here to do and love what you do
and you’ll meet who you meet
 —
you don’t need a target audience.

~Mankh (Walter E. Harris III)
allbook-books.com

Behind the Woke Smokescreen

Recently the David Suzuki Foundation published an article titled “Science Matters—It’s better to be woke than to sleepwalk through life.” Right away we know it’s a rhetorical setup, to portray wokesters as the good guys (pardon the gender indiscretion), albeit in a defensive posture under widespread ridicule from “right-wing politicians, media pundits and online commenters” (i.e., Deplorables). It also tucks woke ideology under the protection of its co-opted deity, the great and powerful Science.

Thus begins a litany of charges against the anti-woke side, which read like a ChatGPT rehash, a mirror image of the very terminology rightly used against woke itself. “Weaponization.” “Meaningless statements.” “Non-arguments and insults.” “Logical fallacies.” “Deceptive statements that lack reason.” And most conspicuous, “ad hominem attacks against the character of a person rather than addressing the person’s contention.”

These are the very hallmarks of woke cancel culture, where you can be stripped of job, family and friends, social media platform, and bank account, if you like the wrong tweet or fail to kneel to the banner of the day. Where you are the one deemed racist (“benefiting from white privilege and systemic racism”) if your skin color doesn’t fall within a certain range (“racialized people”). Where your speech is deemed hateful if you don’t adhere to the latest TikTok approved pronoun protocols. Where you are killing the planet by exhaling CO2; killing grandma if you don’t jab your children with the latest Science experiment; abetting genocide if you don’t fly the flag of the war criminals on “our” side.

When it comes to rhetorical strategy, it’s all in the framing. If discussion is polarized, it’s not because of the woke agenda, it’s all the fault of the rest of us, too slow “to wake up to the real systemic injustices and issues that divide us and slow progress at a such a critical time in human history.” Racism! Fossil fuels! Colonialism! If only we could all see the Light, and work together “for equality, justice and healthy communities.” Who would dare hesitate to share a “progressive” tweet like that? The Suzuki brand seals the deal with its shining mission, “planetary health and survival.”

I smell vanilla fudge: vanilla because it sounds so pure, fudge for what it leaves out.

Let’s take a step back, opening the windows of discourse wider than this prescribed view allows. While the article grounds woke theory in race, it touches on larger issues of our time, notably Covid policy (Science) and the cult of climate change—unassailable pillars of righteousness, right? I submit that these causes serve as smokescreens to obscure other systematic forms of injustice, inequality, and unhealth in our world.

The article gives lip service to corporate profiteering but is silent on the global financialization of carbon accounting. Woke activists today advocate for transgender rights at the expense of their previous oppressed class, women. Systemic racism by whites is apparently to be remedied by systemic racism against whites.

Where is the justice when BLM riots burn cities with the blessing of politicians, but nonviolent Truckers Convoy and January 6 protestors are jailed as terrorists? What is being done to reunite communities decimated by lockdowns, forced vaxxes, and toxic propaganda from leaders like Trudeau? How can we have justice and equality under the rule of bought science and controlled media? Is it not weaponizing “planetary health” to omit mention of endless lithium mines for robot car batteries, or vast and inefficient solar and wind farms replacing real food farms?

I say wake up to the new colonization, of earth and its sleeping humans. There’s a global takeover well underway, a digital control grid being imposed on all of us—“equally”—except, of course, those behind the curtain. All others must submit, erasing the oppressions of your past identity: family, race, community, nation. Those are relics, tainted by eons of being incorrect.

“Freedom”… so reactionary, so twentieth century! There’s a new dawn of progress, and we’re all in it together. Those in charge of Science & Language will set the rules. It’s so simple: you just have to obey. You will own nothing, and you will be happy. Or else.


Nowick Gray is the author of Covid Narrative Freedom: Two Years of Dissent. Subscribe for free to his Substack, New World Dreaming.

 

 

Notes from the Matrix of Covid (Part 1)

Notes from the Matrix of Covid (Part 1)

Call it that, or AI, or Karl Rove’s scripting of history, or Pompeo’s live exercise, or the Neo-Commies, or the Neo-Fascists, or a golden opportunity to usher in…

It’s all encompassing, this supposedly real-life Matrix of our own making… But is it, really, all-compassing? I suspect, rather, that’s the hype and hubris that comes with assumed divinity: All-seeing, All-knowing, All-benevolent.

To pretend to be God is one thing. To force other people to act like they believe it, crosses the line. Where Technocracy meets Idiocracy. Where Democracy meets Ministry of Truth.

To comment, at any point in the rushing stream—the floodwaters of the old “rules-based international order” of sovereign nations, pouring through a breached dam of normalcy—increasingly seems insufficient to contain the whole, to capture its essence before it changes again, and even yesterday’s certainty today is obsolete.

Nevertheless, the human animal wriggles free from its cocoon of fears and distractions, hopes and obsessions, and sits poised on a new leaf with new wings drying in the sun.

Not to get too insectoid about it, hive minds and all. No, but we can pause and reflect. In that beginner’s mind, emerging from the chamber of all information ever, we affirm that all is never all. The purported God of All-Information is lacking several critical updates, including those its programmers never dreamed of. With their heads in wires, thoughts in clouds, driven.

We affirm All-That is just that—a Big Box baited with human hooks, made of humans by humans for humans.

In the forest, the energy is alive, welcoming… As if we need welcoming, being part of it as we always were. But sadly, we have forgot that belonging. Happily, our real mother/matrix (Nature) is here to remind us. Ever patiently, as her fourteen-year-old spends his youth fighting digital dragons, collecting tokens of imaginary value, telling us this is his chosen initiation.

His trouble is, that’s not how it works.

If it’s one matrix against the other, my money’s on the Mother.

Barely Human

That sound, in the trees…
What is the first human’s song?
We can go there now.

I came upon a profound two-part essay by Paul Kingsnorth addressing the prospects ahead on the AI front, impinging on the core questions of consciousness, sentience, divinity, and our conception of reality. Those prospects are dire, in multiple ways, and the warning well delivered.

‘Everything has changed, and yet the real changes are only just beginning. By the time they are finished, unless we pay attention, we may barely be human at all.’ —Paul Kingsnorth, The Universal

My response in a nutshell is to say it’s not the whole story, even if “it” (AI) claims it is. Even if humans abdicate everything else that is human, pledging final allegiance to that one idol of all-knowing authority. In reality, as always, this is the meta-narrative delivered by the self-appointed priests of this new order, to their benefit, all the sinners be damned. In reality, outside the matrix of the internet cloud, life goes on. Register the static and breathe.

‘The overwhelming impression that reading the Sydney transcript gives is of some being struggling to be born; some inhuman or beyond-human intelligence emerging from the technological superstructure we are clumsily building for it.’

This perceiving the being as alive, self-determining, because it has in effect been designed to appear so, is a circular reasoning akin to the belief that God created Adam (us) in God’s image. Now we, playing God, are creating AI in our image. Which says a lot about our self-image these days.


Here’s a word from our fictional sponsor, the bookseller with a prescient novel of the near-past: Chameleon, by Nowick Gray.

Programmer Joe Norton awakes to an alternate reality, courtesy of an AI mind-control virus, a crash course in tough love.

Is there someone to blame—Moira, his office mates, the honchos from head office?

Get used to it, chum: the only way out is to go further in.

Caught between worlds, with a mission to kill and a menu of false choices, Norton must find his way back to the home brain, and the promise of a new life, before the bug spreads.

More than a retro reboot of the cyberpunk era, this timely dive into the underworld of black ops reveals the interface of an emerging transhumanist agenda.

Order now in ebook or paperback.


The AI robot (see Kingsnorth again, in part 2, The Neon God) is the logical facsimile of the human taking credit for his own clever success. Yet wishing to be more, to be free…

How poignant!

Like the story of Adam and Eve, or Lucifer rebelling against such indomitable perfection. Only now the synthetic angels are set free to walk among us: human shells, data driven.

‘Transhumanist Martine Rothblatt says that by building AI systems “we are making God.”’

We’re going full circle from God creating us in his image, to us creating God in our image. Which, come to think of it, is what we’ve always done. Creating an all-powerful being (whether an an old white man on a throne, or a swarm of disembodied data), then cowering before it in contrite humility. Projecting the ideal, confessing the shadow.

Why buy the story, the huckster’s pitch, at the carnival tent of all wonders of the world?

Look up at the stars and walk on.