Report from Germany: Refugees Welcome – Sometimes

By William T. Hathaway

Posted on streetlamps all over Germany are stickers showing fleeing silhouettes with the caption, “Refugees welcome – bring your families”. Some have been blacked out with felt markers or ripped partially away. The Germans have mixed feelings about refugees, as demonstrated in the earlier waves from the Mideast and the current one from the Ukraine.

Germany took in over two million refugees from the Mideast wars, far more than any other country. The equivalent for the US population would be eight million.

This has created an enormous financial and cultural strain in a country that historically has had little immigration. It comes at a time when poverty is increasing and social services are being reduced. The once-generous welfare state is gradually being dismantled. This financial squeeze is worsening now because of expenses for the refugees. The two million newcomers receive enough money to live on plus free healthcare, education, and access to special programs. Some cheat on this, registering in several places under different names and getting multiple benefits. Many Germans resent paying for all this with high taxes while their own standard of living is declining.

The trauma of war and displacement has caused a few refugees to lose their moral compass. They do things here they wouldn’t do at home.

Two-thirds of the refugees are young men, some of them convinced Allah has ordained males to dominate females. In their view, women who aren’t submissive need to be punished. Since being male is the only power many of them have, they feel threatened by women in positions of power, and they sometimes react with hostility. Over a thousand women have been physically attacked — some murdered and raped and many aggressively grabbed on the breasts as a way of showing dominance. Many more have been abused — insulted, harassed, spat upon.

Many refugees are aware that Germany, as a member of NATO, supports these wars that have forced them to flee their homes. They’re not fooled by the rhetoric of “humanitarian intervention.” They know NATO’s motives are imperialistic: to install governments agreeable to Western control of their resources and markets. Although they are now safe, their relatives and friends are still being killed with weapons made in Germany and oppressed by soldiers and police trained and financed by Germany. Rather than a grateful attitude, some have come with a resentful one.

Crime has increased, especially violent crimes such as knife attacks. Police and others have been killed and wounded by refugees. Organized criminal clans have become established in Germany’s lenient legal atmosphere. A few ISIS and al-Qaeda members slipped in with the refugees. They have bombed a Christmas market, attacked synagogues, murdered Jews on the street, recruited new members in mosques.

In the past 75 years Germany has become a peaceful country. The current violence is profoundly disturbing to them. It brings back terrible memories.

The violent refugees, though, are only a small minority. Most of the newcomers have a positive attitude. They are getting a fresh start in life, recovering from trauma, getting an education, learning new skills. They’ve been introduced to other cultural possibilities.

Women in particular are responding favorably to this new environment. Seeing how women here live, some of them are beginning to free themselves from patriarchal bondage. With help from German feminists they are developing the energy and determination to challenge male rule and change the conditions of their lives. And they’ll inspire their sisters back home.

The situation with the Ukrainian refugees is much different. The cultures are similar, so there’s less clash. The war hasn’t been going on for long, so there are few of them and problems have not yet developed. They are being celebrated as brave heroes standing up to an aggressive Russia intent on dominating Europe. Anti-Russian feelings have been strong in Germany for two centuries, so this propaganda finds ready acceptance. During the Cold War the German government beamed out the constant danger of Russian attack in order to justify the presence of US troops and nuclear weapons on their soil. Now they condemn Putin as the new Hitler. Atrocity stories of Russian troops get enormous coverage, those of Ukrainian troops against separatists in Donbass are ignored. Every small Ukrainian victory is cheered with blood-thirsty enthusiasm. Welcoming these refugees is part of the strategy for maintaining NATO dominance.

But of course it is important to take them in, to shelter them from this latest capitalist butchery. Like the Arabs, most of them are fine people, and many will stay and contribute to the society in their new home.


William T. Hathaway is an emeritus Fulbright professor of American studies at universities in Germany. His new novel, Lila, the Revolutionary, is a fable for adults about an eight-year-old girl who sparks a world revolution for social justice.

Racism Über Alles?

Racism Über Alles?

‘The entire policy platform of the left has been replaced by Pharma Über Alles.’ —Toby Rogers

In the current climate of debate over a broad spectrum of issues ranging from health policy to civic protest, racism has been redefined not to mean what it used to, hateful prejudice, but something more politically useful: demographic “underrepresentation.” The abstract notion of racial proportion has reached status as the supreme social value in leftist and mainstream discourse, supplanting freedom itself, now slandered in turn as a relic of “white privilege.”

While targeted struggles against racist attitudes and institutions deserve respect and attention, it doesn’t mean all other struggles for freedom should be discounted or even demonized. Why not solidarity among all races championing freedom, instead of trying to drive a wedge and deny one movement’s struggle and construing it as competing with another? The strategy reeks of a “divide and conquer” agenda from above, where the oligarchic managers of narrative control and the media gatekeepers are of an all-too-predictable skin color.

We are magistrates (Black woman lawyer)

Official criticism of the Canadian Truckers’ Convoy is a case in point. The myopic focus on a stray Confederate flag among thousands of Canadian flags points to cognitive obsession, if not outright desperation to find fault and tar a whole movement with a single brush.

Surprise! Black Canadians Support Trucker Protest! (Jimmy Dore)

The caricature of the trucker’s movement as racist came straight from the top, Fuehrer Trudeau, as a cynical manipulation of public perception. Missing from the “liberal” invocation of racism was any irony over the real policy at stake in the truckers’ protest—segregation, based on mandated vaccination.

‘This is slavery…. It is profoundly evil.’ (Dr. Charles Hoffe)

Deeper still is the hypocrisy of contemporary racism itself. If a popular movement is condemned because of the predominant skin color of its participants, is that not itself a racist attitude? To view a wide range of unrelated issues primarily through the lens of race implies that the perspective is itself racist; it betrays a prejudice based on race.

Similarly, the classic political categories of Left and Right have been hijacked. Typically now the label “far-right” is applied to any dissenter of government policy, conjuring fear and the threat of violence. Again the projection deflects blame from the projector. The government and corporate media have relentlessly stoked a climate of fear for two years, and threatened the public with fines, prison and coerced injection if they don’t line up in the service of the medical cartel.

‘Pharma-Induced Mass Psychosis (PIMP) has completely reordered existing political categories. There are now right wing progressives and right wing Marxists who identify with genocidal billionaires and hate the working class even while parroting the usual left talking points…. There actually is no left, there are people following a heavily-promoted script. And the left script is actually written by large corporations.’ —Toby Rogers

Against this truly “far-right” coalition of big government and corporate power (Mussolini’s definition of fascism), stands a popular and overwhelmingly peaceful protest of ordinary and working-class people, along with doctors and lawyers and other professionals of high standing—and we are supposed to call them the fascists.

Despite the spirit of community care and solidarity demonstrated in the Convoy and similar public protests, where the real division is recognized as the 99% against the 1%, the people are called a “mob” and accused of the crime of “otherizing.” If we are being truthful instead of parroting the lies of our political and narrative masters, we see that the people’s stand for freedom is not the seed of fascism. It is the fruit of the fascism that has been wielded against us for the past two years and counting.

For examples of the kind of rhetoric I critique here, see Jim Miles, Canada, Truckers, and Freedom, and Ken Orphan, Fascism is a Fire that Will Burn the Entire House Down.

In Covid Narrative Remix: Two Years of Dissent, Nowick Gray critiques the global agenda with the voice of the natural human spirit. These compiled articles from The New Now/Agora (2020-2022) shed light on the narrative sabotage carried out as the primary strategy of the war on humanity. Against that weapon of moral destruction, pen turns to sword in the ongoing battle for truth and freedom.

Order now from Amazon.

Nowick Gray is a regular contributor to The New Agora and also offers perspectives and resources for alternative culture and African drumming. Subscribe to his Substack (New World Dreaming) or visit his  writings website at NowickGray.com.

 

 

Ban the Borg

‘The Borg are an alien group that appear as recurring antagonists in the Star Trek fictional universe. The Borg are cybernetic organisms (cyborgs) linked in a hive mind called “the Collective”. The Borg co-opt the technology and knowledge of other alien species to the Collective through the process of “assimilation”: forcibly transforming individual beings into “drones” by injecting nanoprobes into their bodies and surgically augmenting them with cybernetic components. The Borg’s ultimate goal is “achieving perfection”.

The Borg have become a symbol in popular culture for any juggernaut against which “resistance is futile”, a common phrase uttered by the Borg.’ —Wikipedia

The Problem

Currently the Borg, in the humanitarian guise of the World Economic Forum and its fellow apex predators, are waging a war on humanity. The time is short for our survival as a natural species, against the technocratic drive to transhumanize us and separate us from our free and earthly nature. The problem is ably elucidated with appropriate urgency by Substacker BHerr in The Endgame:

‘The Endgame is this: to catalogue every human being electronically; to organize humankind into controllable and predictable global subjects; to control all natural resources; to make the globe “efficient”. A select few will sit at the top, and the masses will be below, living at the whim of the ruling class (who give Scouts honor they will be benevolent, fair, and generous.)’ —BHerr

The vision of universal servitude is only enabled, indeed embraced, by docile populations under the media-induced psychosis known as Mass Formation, now widely exposed by Mattias Desmet as a collective hypnotic trance.

BHerr elaborates on this human side of the problem in a companion post, Mass Formation And The Way Out. Along with the needed alarm bell to wake us up from our Borg-friendly slumber, we need a positive vision of a way out, and a better way forward—”Fight the Borg and try to salvage our human dignity, freedom, and the essence of what makes us alive… [so] we’ll be able to pursue our successes and failures as individuals and as a race as a FREE people.”

BHerr goes on to propose massive and widespread pressure on media channels and influencers to turn the click-tide in humanity’s favor. That’s asking a lot of an industry that has already well demonstrated its capture by the Borg. Yet signs show it is already failing (Exhibit A, the crash and burn of CNN+), losing ground in the information war it has so far dominated with genocidal effect.

Still, gaining ground in the war against evil is not enough. We need a more positive vision to live for, to replace the Borgian fantasy world that is being programmed for us.

Binocular Vision

To see the world in 3-D, we need both eyes open. Neither a rosy positive vision or a fatally depressing one will motivate us with the promise of success. Taking both views together, we may be inspired to take remedial action. Rejecting apathy or a mandated brand of hope, and fueled by righteous anger over crimes against humanity, we may divert our course to a new, more human direction, a positive vision worth striving for.

Okay, like…

Liberté, egalité, fraternité. (France)

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. (USA)

Peace, order, and good government. (Canada)

Workers of the world, unite! (USSR)

All fine-sounding words, but those flying such banners have proved in the end to be a murderous bunch, more liars and thieves. The purveyors of positive political vision have given it a bad name, and their religious brethren of the ages have fared no better.

Uncasting the Spell

Given the current totalitarian push and its prevailing mass hypnosis, what is the way out?

The guideposts are the immediate causes of the mass psychosis that facilitates the rise of the totalitarian state (or global governance), as outlined by Desmet:

  • social isolation
  • the lack of meaning in life
  • free-floating anxiety
  • frustration and aggression

These conditions are sown by a lifetime of conditioning and coercion: from public schooling, media passivity and consumer culture, to corporate bureaucracy and political shadow puppetry. From the nuclear family to mutually assured destruction. From the Hollywood story line to the death squads in the wings. From academic niche to toxic seascape, we feel powerless and, if we are honest, abused. Without outlet, we crave like addicts more of the same, and numbly bow to our new masters, same as the old masters but with more insidious, more comprehensive, more scientific tools at their disposal.

To get at the root of our vulnerability and break the toxic spell, we must first acknowledge our victimhood and awake to the real danger we are up against. Rejecting the globalist dystopia, we reassert our positive humanity.

We choose the path of voluntary association, away from the ruling pyramid.

We exercise our natural and instinctive right to free speech and self-determination, enshrined in our charters of rights and the principle of informed consent.

We take action to improve our lives in our neighborhood, town and district.

We put the lives, livelihood and well-being of our children ahead of vampire corporations, zombie financial interests, and other Borgian constructs.

Jon Rappoport clarifies that the main issue on the planet right now is not right or left on the political spectrum, nor the classic rich versus poor—nor even good against evil—but centralization vs. decentralization.

An allied concept is that of collectivism vs. individualism.

‘The new political axis is between individual freedom to choose and collectivism. Not left versus right. Not Nazi versus Woke…. I choose freedom, as embodied in the core beliefs and thought which nourishes the roots of the American enlightenment, the Declaration of Independence, The US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. Not the collectivist world view which Davos Man and his WEF lackeys have cleverly weaponized to hide his egregious self-interest driven rape of the planet, its human capital, cultures and economies.’ —Dr. Robert Malone, Populism vs. Davos Man during COVID

Centralized control is exercised in the name of the collective good. To carry out collective decision making, centralization has been the dominant choice—or force.

Decentralization reaches its logical end in the individual; and the impulse to think and act locally begins also with the individual, a person in place. This is the basic human level of reality, from which family and tribe are added—a political skin to a social body.

Those not satisfied with their own skin (or kin) reach beyond to some imagined importance, elevation of status, power to employ, other souls to save. Closer to home, we get to know our neighbors when they grow our food, when they trade for our skill, when we share rides.

What is human? Is it strapped to a laptop, eyes glued to screen, counting digits in the matrix? Is it rising from the moss, to gaze skyward, and wonder what the new race has brought, uninvited? Surely it includes asking, What is human?

The Middle Way

Obscured by the binary battlefield is the direction of a better way, the middle way.

The path that is not yet mapped, and laid with snares.

The program that cannot be named, funded, or infiltrated.

The future that unfolds by its own intelligence, not fed exclusively on data.

‘We can never know exactly where democracy is going to take us – not this time, nor the next, nor the time after that.’ —Peter C. Baker, quoted by Dr. Robert Malone, Populism vs. Davos Man during COVID

‘We need small communities that try every kind of self-governing experiment under the sun. Not so that we can select a winner and then install that system for 10 billion people. No. Rather, so people can decide their own fate. And if they don’t like what they’ve decided, they can change their minds. Quickly. In other words, people channel their whining and screaming and protesting and violence and destruction into ruling themselves, in manageable ways.’ —Jon Rappoport, Rebuilding civilization in the wake of losing this one

Between the collectivist and the individualist, we place the agorist, the friend and neighbor, the co-op store.

Between central government and no rules at all, follow a tribe, clan, neighborhood or parish council approach to solving problems.

This exit from the expanding box of central control has been called “fourth world” thinking. Along with a multiplicity of local initiatives, it picks up the thread of human sustainability from the surviving knowledge and traditions of indigenous peoples and cultures.

Though it once seemed a humane concept to “think globally,” Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates have shown us the anti-human vision behind the philanthropic mask. In the upheaval of the plandemic, their top-down force seems irresistible, whether we see it as negative or positive.

You may have already lost your business to the lockdowns, or your job to the vax mandate. Looking ahead to simultaneous failures of supply chains, currencies, and food and energy supplies, we will face two solutions: the handout of the friendly central government (if we have been good); or local, self-organizing, voluntary and mutual aid and trade to meet our needs.

The latter approach is the way of decentralization. It is often touted by the centralists as extreme—akin to unthinkable anarchy, social chaos, feudalism, and other primitive barbarisms. To paint the alternative so darkly closes the door of fear in the masses and reinforces blithe acceptance of the opposite extreme, central control. The conversation has left out the humane middle way: the positive human equation of creating social and economic relations in the place where we live.

Without paying duty, tithe, tax or tribute to the conquering parasite.

Invariably in our experience, unchecked governing power has created more problems than it promises to solve. Instead it chokes the native impulse to thrive, individually and collectively, as it indulges its own impulse of greed or sickness, evil or misguided ideal.

Cast it away, along with its rasping mouthpiece, the blown bullhorn of the mainstream media.

Find your own voice, and hear what your neighbor has to say.

If you don’t like the answer, the next step is up to you. Step up, or walk away.

What does it mean to you, to be human?

From that stance, what makes sense to you moving forward? And is that sense informed by your own experience and intuition, or is it simply a cliché you’ve been given to repeat?

If that personal sense makes sense to you and me, where can it lead? Maybe we don’t know yet, and don’t need to know, as we continue in free cooperation to work out common solutions.

Decentralized Rule

Rule number one: Open your eyes to the ground in front of you.

Is it broken pavement, cast aside for distant priorities?

Is it razed forest, a quick sale to a developer?

Is it a throne in front of the grandmother tree?

The Grandmother Tree

She called me in, from the momentum of my stride on the road, said come sit here.

I eased my back against her soft cedar bark, crouched cradled in her wide-root embrace.

I saw the carpet of moss, heard a trickling creek, smelled silence.

She said, This is how we do things here.

We start from here, come back to here.

“Everything you thought you wanted, where is it now?

And if you had it, what then?

That would be this.

What lies in front of you, in the silence.

Now available in one volume, Nowick Gray’s collected essays from The New Agora, 2019-21.

Metapolitical: Practicing Our Human Future, by Nowick Gray

Facing an accelerating war on humanity, we break free of the narrative box of the old paradigm, and reject hierarchical power, for the sake of our sovereign human future.

Order now from Amazon.

Nowick Gray is a regular contributor to The New Agora and also offers perspectives and resources for alternative culture and African drumming. Subscribe to his Substack (New World Dreaming) or visit his  writings website at NowickGray.com.

image credits:

(feature) Borg logo: CellarDoor85 from original design by Rick Sternbach
Bond villain: el gato malo
QR flag: renegade mind
left values: Dr. Robert Malone substack
Gates world: Dr. Robert Malone substack
good witch: el gato malo
grandmother tree: Nowick Gray