Heartsongs and Karaoke Opinions

by Mankh 

“But I’ll know my song well before I start singin’.”
~ Bob Dylan, from “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall”

The deception of technology is that its easy accessibility belies both the violence of production and the lack of consciousness of spirit or what East Asians refer to as “chi/qi – vital energy.”

The rapid reach to a global audience via gadgetry has created a plethora of productions – from podcasts to social media platforms – affording anyone with access the ability to project their opinions and viewpoints. This has its democratic positives and is helping to fill the rotten-toothed gaps of corporate media. Yet the instant gratification of social media gadgetry has dulled the respect for deep preparation, maturity, ripening on the vine, and right-wise timing. To my knowledge, East Asian and Indigenous Peoples show the most respect to elder generations.

To follow the epigraph metaphor, “songs” have become a fastfood buffet of opinions and unchecked or manipulated facts. The darker side of the coin is the outright squelching and censoring by the powerless that don’t know how to be, thus they incessantly spew new bits of information into the media/social-media sphere, to which the populace then reacts, re-spewing their karaoke of opinions. This ongoing ping-pong of songs perpetuates a binary of yays/nays, likes/dislikes, you’re right/you’re wrong — all of which is leading to a demise of nuance, and an increase of divisiveness.

The fear is that if you miss a minute, you’ll be out of touch and not up to date with the most current info. You’ll lose the argument, and, as with the Pavlovian repetitiveness of advertising, jeopardize your career.

This is the prevailing hyperactive, narrow-minded wind I notice, as the masses of would-be stars, bombastic pundits, and plastic shaman jockey for position of likes, hits, comments, applause, boos, and OMG will you marry me?! It’s a seemingly endless open mic karaoke, where only a few songs get covered by almost everybody.

Needles in a haystack

At its finest, the gadgetry landscape provides a global community bulletin board. Yet the gadgetscape is detached from land, and, as with all colonial capitalist-based products, the consumers become detached from the violence toward earth, rivers, songbirds, bees, front-line minorities and minors. Two recent books I’ve read give ample examples: Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives and The Rare Metals War: The Dark Side of Clean Energy and Digital Technologies; the gists are: pollution and destruction of natural habitats along with the beings that live there, and too-often slave/torture labor, sometimes ending in death.

Add to that a most recent hotspot in Nevada, Thacker Pass (Peehee Mu’huh), where Lithium Americas Corp. has already destroyed sacred Paiute and Shoshone lands and habitat in an effort to landgrab lithium for electric vehicle batteries for GM. The Natives have recently put up a tipi on the dirt road (created by Lithium Americas Corp.), blocking truck access. What’s happening could be a watershed moment, as other such mining projects are on the charts. And by the way, an immense amount of water is needed to produce the lithium in a drought-ridden area, for faux clean energy. See Protect Thacker Pass & Ox Sam Camp for more:

https://www.facebook.com/ProtectThackerPass/ &

https://twitter.com/oxsamcamp

My daily research efforts to combat the monsters involves a list of news sites, Twitter and FaceBook posts, along with intuitively following the trails of mentions of phrases, people, organizations and such like from which I find needles of truth in a haystack of propaganda (though some would argue whether they are “truths”). And with even a few minutes of research, one can sometimes find out what corporation owns what corporation owns the opinions of what people. Don’t just follow the money, ask to speak to the manager, no, too much hold-time; instead, websearch to find who the head honchos are, for example, website pages “about” “who we are” and Wikipedia business listings.

Once more, with feeling!

At the interpersonal and psychological levels of behavior, except for emoji hearts and faces, exclamation points, ALL CAPS, and select videos/podcasts/radio shows, the use of gadgetry lacks consciousness of spirit, chi/ki, or more colloquially, feelings! En masse, we have been conditioned into becoming one-click shoppers and button-pushers who then overreact if our buttons are pushed, if our opinions are challenged or we didn’t get exactly what we privilege entitlement wanted.

In his 1956 book, The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing, Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D. wrote:

“Increasingly the population has been seduced by the idea of remote control. The arsenal of buttons and gadgets leads us into the magic dream world of omnipotent power. Our technical civilization gives us greater ease, but it is challenge and uneasiness that make for character and strength.”

Where’s the originality? The tried and true? The tried and true originality? Why the incessant need to have a message? Why the need for constant approval? In the documentary film The Social Dilemma, the gadgetry, especially cell-phone, is referred to as a “digital pacifier.” To avoid feelings of loneliness, discomfort and anxiety, people, especially younger generations, have been programmed to reach for the hardware. The difference between today and the TV of my generation is that the gadgets are interactive and beckoning for your attention, even when OFF. A quote from the film: “There are only two industries that call their customers ‘users’: illegal drugs and software.”

How many times a day do you reach for the gadgetry?

How many times a day do you gaze at the leaves of a plant, the sky, look within?

In my experience, the art of preparation, maturity, and right-wise timing is nurtured by quiet, by listening, being open to receive, careful study, finding reliable sources (ay, there’s the rub), staying vigilant, learning from mistakes, and being content with off the radar successes.

Heartsongs

In his brief almost 14 years, Mattie Stepanek was conscious of what he called his “heartsong” and that everyone has one. “Stepanek suffered from a rare disorder, dystautonomic mitochondrial myopathy” and, sadly, passed away at age 13. He “published seven best-selling books of poetry and peace essays.” (Wikipedia)

While the ripening vine mode is a steady, guiding and reliable energy source, an openness to the immediacy of the present with all its potential and timeless heartspace can intermittently override the evolutionary progression model.

Actually, both modes intertwine. Haiku master Matsuo Bashô expressed it neatly:

at the old pond–
a frog jumps in
sound of water

While maintaining the day-to-day well-being of and caring for the pond (protecting sacred waters and/or your sacred space), be calm, alert and ready for a frog jump and subsequent splash! It could be fun, it could be traumatic, or in- between. Ah, the Mystery.

By aligning our heartsongs and rhythms with the pulses of Earth, the cycles of the seasons, the wheeling of the stars, and those we hold dear, we have a better chance to thwart the untimely knee-jerk behavior of those who seek to destroy the inherent ebbs and flows by enforcing a perpetual boom-time based on violence and numbing distractions. The folly of their efforts and perhaps your participation as consumer is obvious. Yet to hasten the demise of such folly, I suggest that each person must muster the vital energies, know the song, and start singin’!

~ Mankh (Walter E. Harris III) allbook-books.com

 

 

Who’s Your Target Audience?

by Mankh

a percentage of the world
doesn’t have a computer or mobile-phone,
who’s your target audience?

many people don’t believe or trust
the corporate news anymore, many do,
who’s your target audience?

thus far in 2023, in the USEmpire
over 180 mass shootings

in 2022, over 400 defenders
of Mother Earth and human rights in 26 countries
were killed

In 2020, global military spending was almost 2-trillion dollars,
who’s the target audience?

the Robin — who has built a nest outside my office window
without ever watching a video on how to build a nest —
will not read this poem but we are still friends

the uncountable blades of grass
simply will not read a single book,
who’s my target audience?

however many grains of sand remain
because they are an over-consumed resource,
who’s the target audience?

the universe supposedly sports about
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars . . . . .
reminding each of us 

be your true self,
stay with the path,
do what you’re here to do and love what you do
and you’ll meet who you meet
 —
you don’t need a target audience.

~Mankh (Walter E. Harris III)
allbook-books.com

Behind the Woke Smokescreen

Recently the David Suzuki Foundation published an article titled “Science Matters—It’s better to be woke than to sleepwalk through life.” Right away we know it’s a rhetorical setup, to portray wokesters as the good guys (pardon the gender indiscretion), albeit in a defensive posture under widespread ridicule from “right-wing politicians, media pundits and online commenters” (i.e., Deplorables). It also tucks woke ideology under the protection of its co-opted deity, the great and powerful Science.

Thus begins a litany of charges against the anti-woke side, which read like a ChatGPT rehash, a mirror image of the very terminology rightly used against woke itself. “Weaponization.” “Meaningless statements.” “Non-arguments and insults.” “Logical fallacies.” “Deceptive statements that lack reason.” And most conspicuous, “ad hominem attacks against the character of a person rather than addressing the person’s contention.”

These are the very hallmarks of woke cancel culture, where you can be stripped of job, family and friends, social media platform, and bank account, if you like the wrong tweet or fail to kneel to the banner of the day. Where you are the one deemed racist (“benefiting from white privilege and systemic racism”) if your skin color doesn’t fall within a certain range (“racialized people”). Where your speech is deemed hateful if you don’t adhere to the latest TikTok approved pronoun protocols. Where you are killing the planet by exhaling CO2; killing grandma if you don’t jab your children with the latest Science experiment; abetting genocide if you don’t fly the flag of the war criminals on “our” side.

When it comes to rhetorical strategy, it’s all in the framing. If discussion is polarized, it’s not because of the woke agenda, it’s all the fault of the rest of us, too slow “to wake up to the real systemic injustices and issues that divide us and slow progress at a such a critical time in human history.” Racism! Fossil fuels! Colonialism! If only we could all see the Light, and work together “for equality, justice and healthy communities.” Who would dare hesitate to share a “progressive” tweet like that? The Suzuki brand seals the deal with its shining mission, “planetary health and survival.”

I smell vanilla fudge: vanilla because it sounds so pure, fudge for what it leaves out.

Let’s take a step back, opening the windows of discourse wider than this prescribed view allows. While the article grounds woke theory in race, it touches on larger issues of our time, notably Covid policy (Science) and the cult of climate change—unassailable pillars of righteousness, right? I submit that these causes serve as smokescreens to obscure other systematic forms of injustice, inequality, and unhealth in our world.

The article gives lip service to corporate profiteering but is silent on the global financialization of carbon accounting. Woke activists today advocate for transgender rights at the expense of their previous oppressed class, women. Systemic racism by whites is apparently to be remedied by systemic racism against whites.

Where is the justice when BLM riots burn cities with the blessing of politicians, but nonviolent Truckers Convoy and January 6 protestors are jailed as terrorists? What is being done to reunite communities decimated by lockdowns, forced vaxxes, and toxic propaganda from leaders like Trudeau? How can we have justice and equality under the rule of bought science and controlled media? Is it not weaponizing “planetary health” to omit mention of endless lithium mines for robot car batteries, or vast and inefficient solar and wind farms replacing real food farms?

I say wake up to the new colonization, of earth and its sleeping humans. There’s a global takeover well underway, a digital control grid being imposed on all of us—“equally”—except, of course, those behind the curtain. All others must submit, erasing the oppressions of your past identity: family, race, community, nation. Those are relics, tainted by eons of being incorrect.

“Freedom”… so reactionary, so twentieth century! There’s a new dawn of progress, and we’re all in it together. Those in charge of Science & Language will set the rules. It’s so simple: you just have to obey. You will own nothing, and you will be happy. Or else.


Nowick Gray is the author of Covid Narrative Freedom: Two Years of Dissent. Subscribe for free to his Substack, New World Dreaming.